Attendees:
Wilma Morrissey
Steve Taylor
Faith Hahn
Mary Burne
Cathie Oliver
Dejung Gewissler
Eric Anderson
Michael Craghan
Andy Thomas
Tom Thomas
The meeting began with
group introductions.
Mr. Taylor introduced
the guest speakers,
Mr. Tom Thomas and Mr.
Andy Thomas from Thomas
Associates. The presentation
featured a Geographic
Information Systems
(GIS) modeling tool
that may be helpful
to area municipalities
in planning future land
uses. The model is designed
to highlight lands protected
by existing laws and
policies and graphically
display where protected
lands are in relation
to other lands uses
such as commercial and
residential land use
zones. The goal is to
give planning boards
a better understanding
of where development
can occur and where
natural features should
be protected.
The presented GIS project was conducted for Sussex County and provided a build-out analysis based on the State's nitrate dilution model. Sussex County started the project from scratch by building GIS data layers with the most elementary data layers like streets as an overlay. The goal of the project was to investigate where development can occur in the county once properties were properly accounted for by ownership, use, and environmental constraints.
To assist the design
of the project, a Strategic
Growth Advisory Council
was formed with 17 members
and was assigned six
tasks:
" Collect existing
and new GIS data
" Prepare countywide
GIS program
" Develop a build-out
analysis
" Develop a fiscal
impact analysis
" Engage in a "visioning"
process, and
" Institute a public
participation process
The Visioning process
was formed to facilitate
development of a new
Master Plan for the
County. Four questions
were posed:
" Where are we
now?
" Where to we want
to go?
" What do we want
to be?
" And, how do we
get there?
The following key data
layers were compiled
and examined for the
project:
" Existing land-use
" Residential zones
" Wetlands and
streams
" Steep slopes
Potential areas for development were examined by looking at physical characteristics first. A database component was created featuring lots, zones, municipalities, area, district name, etc. In the end, 818 zoning districts were mapped featuring sewer service areas and future service areas. The results showed that 90 percent of the area was anticipated to be on septic under build-out scenario.
The Trella-Douglass Nitrate Dilution Model was utilized to show nitrates from septic systems and was based on soils, 4 members per household, over 100 soil types, and assuming 2.4 - 3 acres for septic disposal area for entire county. Then the question was asked, "how many acres conform to these requirements?" The result was that the majority of properties do not conform to NJDEP septic standards.
A key data layer for the project was termed the "eco-zoning layer" that included items such as wetlands, stream buffers, steep slopes, endangered species, C1 classification, trout production, trails, farmland preservation, reservoirs, state & federal property. Some in the community did not want steep slopes taken out so a compromise was established that permitted 1 dwelling per 10 acres. The thought was that there may be natural shelves on the property that would allow a building.
The final product was based on zones or areas of protection and development. Information is not currently available by specific lot. A key lesson for town decision makers is that they need to save commercial vacant land now. For Sussex County, there is concern that there is not enough left to ensure the economic vitality of the area.
This type of analysis can be extremely helpful to municipalities in planning future land uses. It can provide important information about land use capacity and the diversity of use. It can be very informative to local decision makers when deciding where and what type of development should occur throughout a municipality. It provides more comprehensive investigation into what a township can support and where essential preservation measures must occur.
Following a short discussion on protecting parklands, the meeting adjourned at 9:00 p.m.